On Tue, 23 Aug 2005, Dimitri Glazkov wrote: > > I may have spoken too soon on the absence of rich text editing textarea > in WF2. > > Looking at the spec, there is an accept attribute for the textarea > element, and its description fits the bill very nicely. If we have > accept="text/html" or accept="application/xml+xhtml", it is totally up > to the UA to provide a specialized editor -- the HTML editor in this > case. > > Am I right on this one?
Yes, but note that the UA is not required to perform any validating or anything. In practice I doubt we'll ever see useful implementations (whereas we already have useful, and used, implementations of the contentEditable feature). -- Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'