ROBO Design wrote:
I took a closer look into the source code of both of the specifications. Interestingly, you don't use XHTML 1.0 strict, you stick to valid HTML 4.01 Strict (no </html> !).
There's no reason to use XHTML 1.0 over HTML 4.01; in fact there are many reasons not to. For starters, IE doesn't support XHTML and it would be rather ironic to write a spec designed for backwards compatibility in IE, using a language it doesn't even support.
See this, and search google, for more information about XHTML vs HTML. http://www.hixie.ch/advocacy/xhtml
Last, but not least, please let us know about the advantages of using lang="en-GB-hixie". I'm really curious about the reason for doing so.
http://ian.hixie.ch/bible/english -- Lachlan Hunt http://lachy.id.au/
