On Wed, 26 Oct 2005 22:13:08 +0300, Ian Hickson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Wed, 26 Oct 2005, ROBO Design wrote:
<...>
Yes. (Note that the </html> tag is optional, but its absence is an
artefact of the tools I use to generate the spec).
<...>
Right, the WF2 spec contains the WF3 wishlist at the end, and the WA1
spec
contains notes all over the place.
<...>
Why not? People have found the WF3 notes useful. I agree they shouldn't
be
visible, but what's wrong with having them as comments?
It is interesting ... but ... 'weird' to me at least :).
<...>
I might provide a split version in due course but it would be a lot of
work so I'm not planning on doing it any time soon. I'd rather cut
features out, to be honest.
A split version would be good, but only for final. I know it takes time
and work, that's why only for final.
<...>
As others have indicated, there's a spec for that language code. :-) But
it's mostly for fun.
I believed so, but that 'spec' of the language code is not really a spec,
it's more of a 'serious joke' :). Some guys 'defended' the use of
en-GB-hixie, like it's something usual :). Thanks for clearing it out:
mostly for fun.
--
http://www.robodesign.ro
ROBO Design - We bring you the future
