On Mon, 07 Nov 2005 01:30:41 +0200, Mike Dierken <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
On Mon, 07 Nov 2005 00:26:33 +0200, Dimitri Glazkov
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
As for the "tags" attribute discussion, you guys just invented a
"class" attribute.
Well, that also was one suggestion, but 'class' is mostly for user
interface
rendering, rather than purely semantic meaning. But it may not be
necessary
or workable to have a 'purely semantic' attribute. Some web crawling
system
would likely be able to figure out the semantic equivalence if enough
people
used a small enough set of values for similar things.
Dimitri is right. We did so, but with the purpose of defining semantic
meaning, instead of user interface elements.
Yet, I have to add that what we've suggested is (almost) useless. That's
because the WA 1.0 specification already contains something that can solve
what we wanted: profiles [1].
[1] http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/#profile
--
http://www.robodesign.ro
ROBO Design - We bring you the future
