On Wed, 30 Nov 2005, Anne van Kesteren wrote: > > Quoting Ian Hickson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > I suppose I _could_ copy the definition over but that seems like more work > > than it is worth, really. > > Just add to <http://whatwg.org/specs/web-forms/current-work/#terminology>: > > # The term <dfn>reflect</dfn> in normative contexts is used as > # defined in [HTML5].
This would pose a problem moving forward with WF2 in contexts that do not yet recognise WA1 as a valid specification in its own right. Since everyone understands what it means, it seems simplest for now to simply leave the spec as is. I would argue that it is obvious what "reflect" means in this context. -- Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'