On Thu, 06 Apr 2006 18:11:55 -0300, Henri Sivonen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Section 3.4.
"The repeat-min attribute specifies the number of repetition blocks that
the remove button type will ensure are present each time a block is
removed. Its value must be a positive integer (one or more digits 0-9
interpreted as a base ten number). If the attribute is omitted or if it
has an invalid value then it is treated as if its value was zero."
Is zero intentionally excluded from the permissible values? Wouldn't it
be more natural to spec the integer to be non-negative?
Likely Hixie meant for "positive" to include zero. Still, whether 0 is a
valid value or not is moot: invalid values are assumed to be zero, so it
all functionally adds up to the same thing. I suppose stating that the
value must be a non-negative integer would be more precise.
--
J. King
http://jking.dark-phantasy.com/
