> ever unregister itself as an image/x-flickr handler? (The only theoretical
> case I can see, namely the site changing its server location, seems like a
> bad reason -- you should always support the old location, good URIs don't
> change.)
Perhaps a developer at Flickr made a typo...?
Peter
On 4/24/06, Ian Hickson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Sat, 22 Apr 2006, Christian Biesinger wrote:
> >
> > They can't be checked at the registration point, because the URI might
> > become valid before it is used, and because the networking library
> > might not be able to tell if the URI is valid without fetching it.
> > (It's also not really clear where you draw the line of an "invalid"
> > URI -- is http://192.0.2.812/ an invalid URI?)
>
