White Lynx wrote:
James Graham wrote:
However,
elsewhere on this thread you have convinced me that a lot of CSS work is needed
before it can display maths with any degree of complexity in a pleasant manner
without requiring extensive, per-formula, adjustments to the style properties
that would produce a considerable barrier to authoring.
Default style sheet will handle arbitrary deep nesting patterns consistently
withour requiring ad hoc per-formula adjustments.
I was thinking more along the lines of breaking formulae that are wider than the
current column width, getting bracket sizes right without hand tweaking,
uniform-size matrix cells, embedding of formulae inline, and the various other
things that you suggest will not work within CSS.
--
"You see stars that clear have been dead for years
But the idea just lives on..." -- Bright Eyes
