Le Tue, 27 Jun 2006 14:42:13 +0300, dolphinling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a
écrit:
Mihai Sucan wrote:
There's nothing "wrong" with that. Yet, that's not exactly an image
caption. There's no explicit association between the <img> and the
following <p>.
But there's the implicit association given by the fact that they're
there, together, in the <div>, and nothing else is. Do you really need
anything more than that?
Yes.
That's because <div> does not properly serve this purpose. Your suggestion
is overusing <div>.
Can an aural browser be sure your markup is actually representing an image
with its caption?
You could also use:
<div class="image-caption">
<img />
<p>caption</p>
</div>
However, this looks like a microformat. Nonetheless, it's better than
leaving out the class attribute.
--
http://www.robodesign.ro
ROBO Design - We bring you the future
