On Tue, 12 Sep 2006 15:51:53 +0200, Ian Hickson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Anne van Kesteren forwarded this from Shane McCarron:
XHTML2 will be using the same namespace as XHTML1, and there will not be
two modules.
This has been an "issue" in the XHTML2 draft for some time:
http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml2/conformance.html#s_conform_issue_4
Yeah, I noticed that. I just thought that was there to please someone as
it doesn't really seem like an option, as you point in your reply to
Lachlan... Oh well, should be fun!
I would be more concerned about how they are intending on making
XHTML2 compatible with XHTML1 than with the WHATWG work. For example,
XHTML2's <input> element has basically completely different semantics
than XHTML1's. Even simple elements like <img> and <q> are
incompatible across the two versions, in the current draft.
--
Anne van Kesteren
<http://annevankesteren.nl/>
<http://www.opera.com/>
