Hello,
I just tried to check out how custom element and attribute names work in
current browsers and how they are supposed to work in HTML5, and some issues
seem unclear to me. Given the following fairly minimal document:
> <!DOCTYPE html>
> <html xmlns:x="">
> <title>HTML 5</title>
> <style type="text/css">
> x\:red { background-color: red; }
> x\:blue { color: blue; }
> x\:r\f4le { border: 4px solid green; }
> </style>
> <p><x:red x-attribute=value>red <x:blue>blue</x:red>
> <p>black <x:rôle>rôle</x:rôle> black
1) Firefox renders this as intended, i.e., `red blue' on a red background,
`blue' in blue and the rest of the text in black, `rôle' surronded by a green
frame.
2) Safari does the same, except that Unicode characters (i.e., the accented o
in rôle in this example) are not treated correctly.
3) Opera and IE6 both fail to close x:blue when the containing element x:red is
closed; therefore, the second line `black rôle black' is rendered in blue. I
think the current HTML5 draft requires all custom elements to be explicitly
closed, and I accept this as reasonable although I would have preferred
constructions like <foo>x<bar>y</foo> to be made well-formed and equivalent to
<foo>x<bar>y</bar></foo>.
4) Sivonen's HTML5 validator (http://hsivonen.iki.fi/validator/html5/ as
opposed to http://hsivonen.iki.fi/validator/) says:
> Attribute name must not start with âxmlâ.
I fail to find any mention of this in the HTML5 draft. Has it been borrowed
from X(HT)ML?
Such a limitation would make it more difficult to create conformant
legacy-comptaible documents.
5) The same validator does not allow : or ô in either element or attribute
names, whereas the current HTML5 draft seems to allow all Unicode characters
except whitespace, <, >, = and /. Would someone please clarify this?
6) According to the current draft, authors seem to have the possibility to use
custom element and attribute names of their choice. I do not really want this
to change, but I would suggest that names starting with x- and x: be explicitly
reserved for custom elements and attributes and thus effectively removed from
the HTML namespace. This would be similar to the use of x- in language tags as
defined in RFC 4646 and could be extended to attribute values taken from a list
of possible values defined in the HTML standard.
--
Ãistein E. Andersen
