Henri Sivonen wrote:
Moreover, it says "The plan is, informed by Webforms, to extend HTML forms." as opposed to "adopt WebForms 2.0" or something like that.
I didn't know how to interpret that section about forms when I read it because Tim's statements are rather vague. However, a frightening thought just struck me.
Could it mean that the W3C isn't going to use WF2 directly, but rather push ahead with Dave Ragget's Forms Lite proposal [1]? There seems to be significant discussion about it going on at www-forms [2]. The proposal seems to throw out much of the WF2 work (including some explicitly because of Opera's existing implementation), in favour a very much corrupted version that is somehow attempting to integrate with XForms.
Or will the WHAT WG activities continue with an endorsement from the W3C?
I hope so. [1] http://people.w3.org/~dsr/forms-lite/ [2] http://www.w3.org/mid/[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Lachlan Hunt http://lachy.id.au/
