Alexey Feldgendler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, 2006-10-31 20:54 +0600: > On Tue, 31 Oct 2006 20:43:37 +0600, Michel Fortin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Personally, I'd favor <term> and <time> instead, or anything else > > that conveys a meaning. That's especially important since these > > element will have, most of the time, no noticeable effect on the > > visual representation of the document. > > For <x>, I'd prefer <xref> rather than <term>. But, for me, <x> is just fine.
Given that <xref> as used in other vocabularies is a general cross-reference element that's optionally empty (if empty the text of the cross-reference is generated from the title of element it references), and given that the Web Apps 1.0 <x> isn't a general cross-reference element but instead non-empty "a cross-reference to an instance of the use of a term, such as a taxonomic designation, technical term, an idiomatic phrase from another language, or similar", <term> seems more appropriate than <xref> --Mike
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
