On Nov 1, 2006, at 1:32 PM, Christoph Päper wrote:
The second to last example should probably better read: <var>E</var> = <var>m</var> · <var>c<var><sup>2</sup> or maybe, as the speed of light is a constant, <var>E</var> = <var>m</var> · c<sup>2</sup>. ...
Is that equation ever legitimately rendered (in physics textbooks etc) with the "m" in a different style from the "c"? If not, perhaps the definition of <var> needs to be expanded to include physical constants.
-- Matthew Paul Thomas http://mpt.net.nz/
