Elliotte Harold wrote:
I suspect there are actually two axes here, and they're not orthogonal,
[...]
I agree we don't want to go all the way to 1 on the first axis.
[...]
However, I would turn the second axis all the way to about 0.99
Just to note that, in your model of non-orthogonal axes, you can't
adjust the values independently like this. Moreover, your model of the
axes being number of semantic elements and fraction of semantic elements
doesn't work terribly well -- consider Matthew's point about the
existence of <i> and <b> increasing the utility of <em> and <strong>.
--
"The universe doesn't care what you believe. The wonderful thing about
science is that it doesn't ask for your faith, it just asks for your
eyes" --- http://xkcd.com/c154.html
