Le 22 nov. 2006 à 12:15, Alexey Feldgendler a écrit :
I'm not saying it's a caption either. A caption is just one of the possible ways of rendering a title.
But is a caption limited to a title? Very often, captions contains some explanations too. I just opened a computer architecture book near me I knew was full of figures and the first figure I spotted had a eleven-line caption -- 5 complete sentences.
I know not everyone use captions like this. But calling captions "title" pose two problems: it clashes in name with the title attribute, making both of them a little more ambiguous, and it somewhat limit the correct usage, leaving a hole to be filled for any additional explanation that needs to be attached to the figure.
It's not clear for Google Images which needs to extract (image, title) pairs from documents.
But isn't this a weakness in the table markup? I mean, what if I was using this table layout for non-image data instead, should it be done any different? Maybe scope="" or some other attributes would be more appropriate to express the association.
And I'm not even sure a table is appropriate in this case. Isn't the table there for purely presentational reasons?
Michel Fortin [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.michelf.com/
