Ian Hickson wrote: > [snip] > Here, while the last three are also valid feeds, it is the first one that > should be considered the default when doing auto-discovery. This isn't to > say that the feed UA should ignore the other three, or that it should only > show them if the user goes out of his way to obtain them -- indeed, the > "default" relationship could be completely ignored. It just means that if > it has to automatically pick one, then the first one is the one it should > pick. (It might also decide to only pick the one that is both a feed and > an alternative representation of the document, instead of picking the > default feed.) >
Hmm... Ok, I can live with that. >>[snip] >> Assuming that A includes alternate links to B and C, Can I assume that B >> is also an alternate of C; and vice versa? > > Oh, you mean is the 'alternative' link type transitive? I guess so. I've > added a paragraph to the spec stating this. > [EMAIL PROTECTED] I was trying to think of that word all afternoon. Yes, I was meaning to ask if they were transitive. - James
