Julian Reschke schrieb:
Lachlan Hunt schrieb:
...
The fact is that authors already try things like <div/>, <p/> and even <a/>. I've seen all of those examples in the wild. See, for instance, the source of the XML 1.0 spec (and many others) which claim to be XHTML as text/html, littered with plenty of <a/> tags all throughout.
...

Huh? The thing at <http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-xml/>? Don't see that problem there.

If this was the case at an earlier point of time, it was probably caused by a bug in their XSLT code, not the authors writing the spec (which IMHO uses the W3C's xmlspec XML language).

Best regards, Julian

OK, I take that back.

The main problem here seems to be that <http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-xml/> is served as text/html, but contains XHTML content.

Best regards, Julian

Reply via email to