On Dec 2, 2006, at 09:19, Lachlan Hunt wrote:
The best idea so far for how to make it work is for parsers to automatically recognise the tag names and put them into the correct namespace.
I think putting subtrees rooted at <svg> or <math> in the SVG and MathML namespaces respectively (and allowing /> to close elements while the tokenizer is looking at such a subtree) would be more forward-compatible with future SVG and MathML revisions. (Subtrees rooted at children of SVG <foreignObject> and MathML <annotation-xml> would be put in the XHTML namespace.)
As a further stipulation, xmlns with the right values would be allowed on <html>, <svg>, <math> and children of <foreignObject> and <annotation-xml> but would have no effect.
Any reason why that wouldn't work? Would it be evil? (The above is about the text/html serialization.) -- Henri Sivonen [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://hsivonen.iki.fi/
