> Henri Sivonen wrote: > > Elliotte Harold wrote: > > What I don't understand is why some members of this working group is > > so dead set on actively preventing HTML from being XML. The non- > > draconian error handling I understand. But why are you disappointed > > that <!DOCTYPE html> is well-formed XML? Why the active hostility to > > well-formedness? > > To make a conformance checker not accidentally let MIME type mistakes silently pass in some cases. >
Can you clarify that please, maybe with some examples. As is, I don't understand the concern. -Mike Schinkel http://www.mikeschinkel.com/blogs/ http://www.welldesignedurls.org/
