* Ian Hickson wrote: >No, it doesn't. It doesn't define the syntax at all. It defines how to >parse the syntax, and what to report as a syntax error, but that section >has no normative criteria that apply to documents.
That is quite irrelevant. The definition of the parsing algorithm along with the syntax-independent requirements severely limits what these criteria could be; such criteria could only define that some documents are non-conforming even though they parse into conforming trees without generating parse errors; doing anything beyond that would contradict the rest of the draft. It is actually possible to construct a document that parses into a conforming tree without generating parse errors that does not con- form to the requirements in section 9.1, odd as that may seem. >Such a document is impossible to construct declaratively with the HTML >format, it can only be declaratively constructed with the XML syntax. My point exactly. -- Björn Höhrmann · mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] · http://bjoern.hoehrmann.de Weinh. Str. 22 · Telefon: +49(0)621/4309674 · http://www.bjoernsworld.de 68309 Mannheim · PGP Pub. KeyID: 0xA4357E78 · http://www.websitedev.de/
