On Thu, 30 Nov 2006 03:42:38 +0600, Sam Ruby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What should be the most damning of all is that I found an example on the most > prominent page on the mozilla.org site. No one can say that the authors of > that page didn't make a conscious choice in the DOCTYPE for that page. No > one can say that the authors of that page are ignorant. No one can say that > mozilla has a(n entirely) cavalier attitude towards standards. I was surprised to find the W3C validator consider this page valid. A bug in the validator? -- Alexey Feldgendler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [ICQ: 115226275] http://feldgendler.livejournal.com
