Mike Schinkel wrote:
All really sucessful text formats have been easy to edit (why did
RSS take off while RDF is still struggling to get off the ground?)
>
I don't necessarily disagree with your sentiment, but it could be argued
that RSS has done well while RDF has floundered largely because RSS
solves a real-world problem (how to get news/weblog content into
aggregators) while RDF solves a purely theoretical problem that less
people have a pressing need to solve (A generic representation of
relationships between resources).
