On Tue, 12 Dec 2006, Karl Dubost wrote: > > I think it would help to have a rationale behind each decision or at > least showing the different solution which have been proposed. A bit > like wikipedia when an article is put online, there is an equilibrium > showing the two points of view or more if any. I think that is healthy > in the sense because sharing ideas without wiping out others make all of > us richer more than having resistance which sounds like you against the > world (which might not be healthy for yourself as well.)
I agree that it would be interesting. I don't have the time to set something like this up, sadly. However, if you are willing to help, I would definitely be open to chatting on IRC to explain various design decisions which you could then document on the wiki or in blog posts. -- Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
