On Fri, 15 Dec 2006 23:45:52 +0600, Dean Edwards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
But this element would be purely for the purpose of interacting with CSS so it does indeed seem to be a CSS issue.
Not entirely. It also has some semantic value in that the element acts as a container for other elements that comprise a widget. Perhaps <reset> is the wrong name. I can't think of anything better though. Like I said, I don't like the name "widget" but it gives a better idea of what the element is.
Elements comprising a widget should carry appropriate semantic value by themselves. For example, a properly styled unordered list can be used as a color picker. <widget> should not be used as an excuse for writing a bunch of meaningless <div>s to make a custom control.
-- Alexey Feldgendler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [ICQ: 115226275] http://feldgendler.livejournal.com
