On Sun, 14 Jan 2007 21:12:37 +0100, Matthew Raymond
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Well, first of all, it doesn't cover cases without hyperlinks:
| <p><q>Blah</q>, said Baz</p>
I don't think that case is very interesting.
[...]
As for |source| versus |cite|, I see two problems. First is that the
attributes are so similar that they could get easily confused. Second is
that "source" is essentially the long form of "src", which may cause
even more confusion:
So name it something else. "linkedfrom" was at one point suggested on IRC.
[...]
--
Anne van Kesteren
<http://annevankesteren.nl/>
<http://www.opera.com/>
