On Jan 3, 2007, at 22:12, Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis wrote:

I'll be more convinced about "tools will save us" once I first see
that working on a smaller scale than the Web. Let's say TeXlipse with
the described UI generating BibTeX entries and inserting the proper
\cite{} on the LaTeX side.

I'm baffled by this. I don't know enough about Tex or TeXlipse to
understand why you think this would be a helpful test of the interface.
I'm not even sure how it would apply to the Tex world. As far as I can
see, it's like asking for an implementation of anchor links in TeXlipse. Might you elaborate on why this would be a better proof of concept than
a Firefox extension?

My point was that BibTeX/LaTeX/TeXlipse users are already receptive to the idea that they have to provide rich metadata for citations, so a UI test would not be a matter of testing *if* they provide the data but about *how* they like to provide it.

--
Henri Sivonen
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://hsivonen.iki.fi/


Reply via email to