On Fri, 09 Feb 2007 22:36:25 +0100, Lachlan Hunt
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Anne van Kesteren wrote:
I think I agree that <m> should be dropped. I believe such an element
has never been requested before on www-html or equivalent fora.
No, the use cases for <m> are clear, and it is different from both <em>
and <strong>. I think it should be kept as-is, though its definition in
the spec clearly needs to be improved.
I'm not arguing against this. (Heck, I provided the idea for the second
example.) I'm just saying it hasn't really been requested before and that
I'm wondering whether it's common enough to warrant a new element. Perhaps
<u> can be "reused" for this as Henri suggested or perhaps we shouldn't
really specify this as an element yet and let the microformat community
look into it more closely first.
--
Anne van Kesteren
<http://annevankesteren.nl/>
<http://www.opera.com/>
