On Wed, 14 Feb 2007 12:31:36 +0100, Alexey Feldgendler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

But you can't make *each* of A, B, and C associated with *each* of X, Y -- that's
what the example below does.

What about this?

<dl>
<dt>A</dt><dt>B</dt><dt>C</dt>
<dd>X</dd><dd>Y</dd>
</dl>

Sure you can:

<table>
 <tr><th>A<th>B<th>C
 <tr><td colspan=3>X
 <tr><td colspan=3>Y
</table>

I'm not saying that a table *should* be used in this case, just that the same relationship can be expressed.

--
Simon Pieters

Reply via email to