On Wed, 21 Feb 2007 00:05:47 +0000 (UTC), Ian Hickson wrote: > * Radical new benefits to offset the pain of change > * Backwards-compatibility with the old technology
I agree. > It's the first really open, > collaborative community that has taken on a task of this magnitude AFAICR from Daniel Glazman’s ParisWeb 2006 conference, before W3C, IETF was really open too -- problem seemed to be it was too much open, but I don't know enough of Web history. So WHATWG may be called the “*second* really open, collaborative community”. Or, to put it in a more optimistic light, a “‘back to the origins’ movement.” I don't say so just for nitpicking, but would also appreciate feedbacks from people who were already there by IETF times; what are the difference between “IETF time” and “WHATWG time” in the way of working? -- </david_latapie> U+0F00 http://blog.empyree.org/en (English) http://blog.empyree.org/fr (Français) http://blog.empyree.org/sl (Slovensko)
