* Anne van Kesteren wrote: >On Sun, 25 Feb 2007 14:20:48 +0100, Charles McCathieNevile ><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> One of the sources of complexity in RDF syntax is the requirement that >> it could be included in HTML documents in a way that didn't upset legacy >> browsers. There are assorted use cases for being able to include RDF >> inside documents. > >I think Henri was asking about XHTML5 documents. So legacy doesn't really >matter there. If you put it inside <head> it won't be displayed. (As >opposed to HTML5, where it would imply a <body> start tag and where you >don't have namespaces in the markup anyway.)
Charles is saying, RDF/XML syntax is complex now because compatibility with legacy browsers was a concern back when RDF/XML was being defined. -- Björn Höhrmann · mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] · http://bjoern.hoehrmann.de Weinh. Str. 22 · Telefon: +49(0)621/4309674 · http://www.bjoernsworld.de 68309 Mannheim · PGP Pub. KeyID: 0xA4357E78 · http://www.websitedev.de/
