----- Original Message -----
From: "Daniel Glazman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Andrew Fedoniouk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "WHATWG" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Matthew Raymond"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, March 10, 2007 9:03 PM
Subject: Re: [whatwg] href attribute
On 11/03/2007 05:59, Andrew Fedoniouk wrote:
In any case not all <a>'s are hyperlinks so for your meaning of semantic
they should also not be automatically hyperlinks (or anchors if you
wish). I am pretty sure that existence of 'href' attribute is what
creates semantic meaning of <a> for you. So why <a> cannot be <b href> or
<c href>?
Let me also play the devil (I love it) : a feature is not trashable
only because it comes from XHTML 2.0 :-)
Here, a global href is a really cool idea, we should have done it in
HTML 4 but we were too blind to see.
</Daniel>
:)
BTW: I had a feeling that anchor is a name of region in html.
So <a name="something"> or <h1 id="something"> are
anchors but <a href="..."> or <link href="..."> are links
to some anchors.
But it seems that in such semantically saturated
place as whatwg mail list my used to be clear perception
of simple things like anchors was changed significantly.
Or semanticly? Ah, whatever...
Andrew Fedoniouk.
http://terrainformatica.com
