Gareth Hay wrote:
As has been said, this isn't a legal list.
And a list with "-legal" in the name magically acquires lawyers with the relevant expertise who are willing to give free advice?
At best, we can only conclude that this is a very grey area throughout different regions of the world, and as such, is not only out with the scope of this list, but possibly of the spec itself.
That's a non-sequitur.
Unless legal advice can be sought from all potential markets, I think we are all arguing in vein and should conclude to distance ourselves from including this type of thing in the spec.
That's the fallacy of unattainable perfection. Gerv
