On Fri, 23 Mar 2007 21:47:01 +0100, Maciej Stachowiak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...]

So to be sure I understand your proposal, you're suggesting that instead of

<source type="audio/mpeg" src="mysong.mp3">

You'd say:

<param type="audio/mpeg" value="mysong.mp3">

I think the latter is a lot less clear. Also, <param> would end up having two uses which differ in the following ways:

1) Do you have type/value or name/value as allowed attributes?
2) Which object can contain it?
3) Do you process all of them, or only the first one to match some criteria?

They would effectively be different elements since the processing model and criteria for a valid document would differ.

Yeah. If that's much of a problem I suppose we have to live with <source>...


[...]

One nice thing about using <alt> is that it makes it more clear that only one source will apply. Another nice thing about it is that it could more naturally be extended to supporting playlists, where a single element is declaratively set up to play multiple media files (this is better than using script for this, since you can start buffering the second and subsequent files early).

[...]

I suppose. I rather like the processing model of <video> / <audio> / <source> as it is now though. Not sure how you can easily extend that for playlists. Prolly in a similar way as you proposed for <alt>.


By the way, people also suggested using an external file to contain the playlist.


--
Anne van Kesteren
<http://annevankesteren.nl/>
<http://www.opera.com/>

Reply via email to