Methinks we could easily overcome the semantic problems with the <dialogue> element if we renamed it to <transcript>. Chris
-----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Michel Fortin Sent: Tuesday, April 17, 2007 6:54 PM To: Elliotte Harold Cc: WHAT working group Subject: Re: [whatwg] Sequential List Proposal What I find silly with the current <dialog> proposal is that it just can't handle a lot of trivial cases which would otherwise be perfect use cases. It can't because you can't include non-spoken events to be inserted in the sequence. But then if you allow non-spoken events another problem arise: are dialogs with no spoken part at all allowable? Should the document suddently become invalid when someone deletes the last bit of spoken text in a <dialog> and there remains only some timestamps or events? Michel Fortin [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.michelf.com/
