On Mon, 23 Apr 2007 21:32:57 +0200, ddailey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Makes sense to me. If such a thing is not already spoken for why not aim
toward a little consistency with pre-existing implementations, like in
SVG, where it would be repeatCount="indefinite"?
Not my favorite piece of nomenclature ever, but it's out there and has a
user-base already.
Given that language is already spelled wrong remarkably often introducing
indefinite as attribute value might not be a good idea. Besides that, the
WHATWG specification already breaks with the SMIL model so just copying
some bits doesn't seem like a good justification for consistency.
--
Anne van Kesteren
<http://annevankesteren.nl/>
<http://www.opera.com/>
