Christian Schmidt wrote:
Jonas Sicking wrote:
The idea is basically an element like <iframe> but that renders the
linked page, instead of inside a square area, in flow with the main
page.
This is actually useful not only in Ajax-like applications like the ones suggested in your example but also in more static pages as a replacement for server-side includes. Client-side includes make it easier to make sites that are made up data from different sources. Most developers prefer to avoid server-site includes in favour of letting clients request the resource directly.

Some sites may choose to serve the top-level navigation from one central place, even though the site is made up of several subsites hosted on different servers and platforms by different hosting companies. The <include> element could be used to include the top-level navigation on each of the subsites. Also, content from different subsites could be aggregated on one overview page using <include>.

Ad banners are usually served from a seperate server. Banners with fixed proportions are probably better served using an IFRAME, but e.g. Google's text-ads may vary in size and could benefit from being a part of the page.

Note that for security reasons we can't allow the <include> to point to servers other than that of the including page. Otherwise it would be possible to pull information out of documents on another server by using a fragment identifier. For example, the following could be used to see how many bank transactions a user has done in the past month:

<include src="http://citibank.com/cgi/transactions.phptranstable";>

obviously that is a made up url, but you get the general idea.

It is possible that we could overcome this using the access control specification, but I haven't looked into if that would actually work.

/ jonas

Reply via email to