On Mon, 30 Apr 2007 10:31:00 +0200, Anne van Kesteren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
On Mon, 30 Apr 2007 10:25:07 +0200, Simon Pieters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Make <noscript> allowed in XHTML5, and generally remove differences
between HTML5 and XHTML5 where possible.
The use case it has in HTML5 is that you can include <img src=tracker>
or something in there so you have some fallback tracking mechanism.
There is no such possibility in XML. It doesn't do any harm either, I
suppose, but I wonder what the use case is.
Åke Järvklo said in
<http://forums.whatwg.org/viewtopic.php?t=38&start=15#193>:
Yeah - and I would like to still be able to use something like
<noscript>Note: Scripting is disabled in your browser, please refer
to our <a href="...">accessibility policy</a> for the implications of
this</noscript>
regardless if I work in XHTML5 or HTML5 for the moment.
This could thus also imply:
* Don't disallow lang="" in XHTML5
* Don't disallow <base href> in XHTML5.
I agree with these. xml:lang should be treated the same as xml:id imo
(except that for now I suppose they have different handling if both the
xml: and normal attribute specified).
Agreed.
* Don't disallow <meta charset> in XHTML5 (it doesn't do any good,
but doesn't harm either).
If it doesn't have any effect wouldn't that be confusing?
Possibly.
--
Simon Pieters
