Sander Tekelenburg wrote:
At 12:53 +0300 UTC, on 2007-05-04, Henri Sivonen wrote:
3) I make the conformance checker emit a warning (at most one per
document) that paraphrases the informative paragraph when the
conformance checker sees a style='' attribute.
The "at most one per document" restriction under 3 I'm not entirely sure
about though. I understand it's counter productive to bug users about issues
more often than strictly necessary. But for authors who rely on conformance
checkers to find their mistakes so they can fix them, it would be quite
unuser-friendly to have this warning not point out every instance of that
particular mistake.
So ideal behaviour would probably be a single warning, listing all instances.
But is that something that can/should be specced? I don't know.
The spec does not need to define specific user interface requirements
like that. Applications are free to optimise their UI in the most
appropriate way they see fit for their users.
Btw, would this be a first for defining something conforming but requiring
conformance checkers to emit a warning? Or are there other instances already?
Conformance checkers wouldn't be required to emit a warning, but they
are free to do if they wish.
--
Lachlan Hunt
http://lachy.id.au/
