On May 9, 2007, at 2:14 AM, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
On Wed, 09 May 2007 11:10:22 +0200, Anne van Kesteren
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
It would be nice if this method described things for image in
terms of .complete. Although I've also heard people suggest they
would like this method to be synchronous when HTMLImageElement is
passed (Bjoern, iirc) so that you don't need the trickery involved
to make sure it's already loaded.
I expressed myself poorly. What I meant with synchronous is that
the method waits for the image to load. In any case, it would be
nice if the specification was a little more exact (or if people
think it already is: elaborate) on the subject.
Based on experience with synchronous XHR, I think we should avoid
adding more synchronous networking operations. In addition, drawing a
partially loaded image may be a desirable behavior in some cases
Regards,
Maciej
