On Wed, 23 May 2007, Julian Reschke wrote: > > > > I wish you luck in changing the TAG's mind on things like this. I've tried > > and not gotten very far: > > > > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2006Aug/0027.html > > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2006Aug/thread.html#msg27 > > Actually, I wasn't planning to. I think that that finding is a good one, > and that we should work on making less content break it.
I recommend reading the first of the two links cited above. It describes what I did to "work" on making less content break it, and why I think that it's a lost cause. -- Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
