On Fri, 15 Jun 2007 20:32:45 +0200, Kornel Lesinski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
On Fri, 15 Jun 2007 02:05:05 +0100, Ian Hickson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I've defined the parsing and conformance requirements in a way that
matches IE. As a side-effect, this has made things like "naïve"
actually conforming. I don't know if we want this.
Rather not. This would break unencoded URLs:
?foo=bar®ion=baz → ?foo=bar®ion=baz
You mean that Internet Explorer breaks them already? That doesn't make
much sense to me.
--
Anne van Kesteren
<http://annevankesteren.nl/>
<http://www.opera.com/>