On Fri, 15 Jun 2007 20:32:45 +0200, Kornel Lesinski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Fri, 15 Jun 2007 02:05:05 +0100, Ian Hickson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

I've defined the parsing and conformance requirements in a way that
matches IE. As a side-effect, this has made things like "na&iumlve"
actually conforming. I don't know if we want this.

Rather not. This would break unencoded URLs:

?foo=bar&region=baz → ?foo=bar®ion=baz

You mean that Internet Explorer breaks them already? That doesn't make much sense to me.


--
Anne van Kesteren
<http://annevankesteren.nl/>
<http://www.opera.com/>

Reply via email to