Dnia sobota, 11 sierpnia 2007 22:14, Maciej Stachowiak napisał: > On Aug 11, 2007, at 10:00 AM, Křištof Želechovski wrote: > > Originally the name after the hash was a bookmark, not a fragment, > > because > > it would be defined on an anchor. I agree that until the new > > semantic makes > > it to the common knowledge using the name "fragment" for the purpose > > may be > > surprising for some developers. > > When was it called a bookmark? I'm pretty sure it has been called a > fragment identifier back to at least the late '90s.
In the early '90s? And I did not say it was called a bookmark but it was like a bookmark semantically. Chris
