On Thu, 13 Sep 2007 11:22:59 +0200, Robert O'Callahan
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 9/11/07, Dimitri Glazkov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Since, AFAIK, the fragment identifier is not passed onto the server by
the UA, I can't see how an application could be designed with proper
noscript degradation and reliance frament ids for query communication.
Besides, using query parameters is much more natural for HTML: forms
with method=get are the way to build it.
Those are good points that I should have thought of :-).
I'm not sure I understand the query parameter use case. If you have a web
page "foo.cgi?page=x" wouldn't that page also be simply the offline page?
What exactly is the scenario in some more detail?
(Note that with history.pushState() you can set the URI of the current
page so the fragment identifier bookmarking argument is "no longer" very
relevant.)
--
Anne van Kesteren
<http://annevankesteren.nl/>
<http://www.opera.com/>
