Darin Adler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, 2007-11-07 11:38 -0800: [...] > I was hoping HTML 5 would document existing practice in a way that's less > vague than what HTML 4 says. > > We could consider changes and new features as well, but that's even more > challenging. Maciej suggested that we dump accesskey and replace it with > something that would solve the real problem, and I think that's also worth > pursuing separately.
I think it's definitely worth pursuing. But while I'm personally not especially fond of accesskey, it's in the same class as some other legacy markup constructs -- something we may all agree is far less than ideal, but that is already widely used in existing content. So we still need to have a more precise spec for it if we want to have a hope of UAs handling it interoperably. --Mike -- Michael(tm) Smith http://people.w3.org/mike/ http://sideshowbarker.net/
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
