Geoffrey Sneddon schrieb: > Apart from those two, the others I can think of are those that are in > excess of twenty years old (and therefore their patents have expired), > such as H.260.
I couldn't find anything insightful about "H.260". Sure you don't mean H.120, which is a 1982 video codec I couldn't find a current implementation of? (Which would explain why Wikipedia is not using it even if it doesn't happen to hopelessly behind in basically every aspect imaginable) H.261, OTOH, is a 1990 standard and thus still a bit away from getting absolutely free. Maik
