On Dec 13, 2007, at 2:51 AM, Christopher Monty Montgomery wrote:
On Dec 13, 2007 5:32 AM, Maciej Stachowiak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
It's unfortunate that this press release conflates Ogg, Vorbis and
Theora.
Although it is a point of nerd pride to correct 'Ogg is just the
container, the codecs are....', that truth depends on context. Ogg is
and always was the name of the whole project. There is nothing wrong
with referring to the total code (and functionality) set as Ogg. The
fact that the codecs' internal names became well known was originally
an accident.
It matters in this case because the press release cites large company
(i.e. potential patent troll magnet) deployment of Vorbis, but then
the press release mostly talks about video.
It also matters because, as I've said, this is already a point of
material confusion. For example, I've seen comment threads (not
involving myself!) on news sites that go something like this:
Poster A: "Theora is not very high quality compared to H.264."
Poster B: "I disagree! My Vorbis audio player gives great sound
quality!"
(At this point I assume Poster A facepalms and quits the Internet
forever.)
I've also seen people claim that before the design of Theora, an
exhaustive patent search was done and it was deliberately coded to
avoid existing patents, or that it is completely free of known
patents. I think both of these things are true of Vorbis, but I do not
believe they are true of Theora.
I think the press release may increase confusion on these sorts of
points.
(The press release also talks about MPEG as if it were a monolithic
thing and not several families of codecs and container formats, but I
didn't complain about that because it's less likely to confuse the
discussion in a material way.)
(Not meant as smackdown, just clairification)
Darn, I was all ready to pull on my wrestling singlet. :-)
Cheers,
Maciej
