On 23/03/2008, Ian Hickson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Isn't that the description of a valid positive integer? If that term is > > not used or defined yet, why not? > > Because "positive" is confusing to people. Some people (including me) > think that 0 is positive.
I'm fairly sure that there are also some people out there who argue that you can have both -0 and +0, and these are two different numbers. Paul -- Paul Waring http://www.pwaring.com
