On Thu, Oct 2, 2008 at 4:34 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, Oct 2, 2008 at 6:27 PM, Brenton Strine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: >> >> On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 11:36 AM, Andy Lyttle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Of course, it's still not in any way semantic. The only difference between > "(optional)" being displayed near the input and being displayed *within* the > input is one of aesthetics. The meaning of the document isn't changed one > iota. This leans me even more toward a CSS solution. I'll just bite the > bullet and bring it up to the CSS WG. > Are you proposing that placeholder could be a positioned object, such as an image? > ~TJ >
