Hello Philip
Philip Taylor wrote:
On Wed, Nov 19, 2008 at 9:35 AM, Martin McEvoy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...]
http://code.google.com/webstats/2005-12/linkrels.html
[...]
If you have a more up to date study on link relationships, please can I have
a link?
http://philip.html5.org/data/link-rel-rev.txt has some more recent
data, from a different set of pages (and so with different biases,
e.g. there's lots of Wikipedia and IMDB pages using
rel="apple-touch-icon"), with less processing (no case-insensitivity
or token-splitting).
Thank you Philip that is the most useful set of data I have seen for a
long time
It basically says that the whole premise that HTML5 should drop *rev*
(a) because authors use it wrong, (b) Many authors use rev-stylesheet
wrong, is a MYTH and an inaccurate assessment of the *rev* attribute
Out of the 127249 pages studied, only 0.09% actually use rev="stylesheet"
Great stuff Thanks!
--
Martin McEvoy
http://weborganics.co.uk/
